|
8th December 2009
Today in Brussels, Prince Mangosuthu
Buthelezi, President of the IFP, addressed an international
conference of the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung on "Elections in
Sub-Sahara Africa: New Dynamics in the Party Systems", and spoke
on "The Challenges of a Traditional Opposition Party".
Prince Buthelezi noted that today's
challenges for a 'traditional' and 'casual' centre-right
opposition party, like the IFP, must be understood within the
highly fluid political economy of South Africa.
He said, "The values of IFP supporters
seem to be broadly converging with the social democratic aims of
the Constitution, as opposed to the more narrowly defined
political aims of the ruling-party. The ANC is a broad church of
elites and interests with a number of competing ideologies."
Buthelezi contends that the electorate
has finally seen the burgeoning culture of entitlement and
institutional incapacity within the State as key factors in both
the enrichment of an ANC low-level kleptocracy, and the failure
of public service delivery.
He expressed concern that South Africa's
impressive national economic growth rate has not been matched by
job creation and that the wealth gap has widened in the absence
of a solid framework of governance.
However, Buthelezi assured that
"Multi-party democracy is thriving and the fears of one-party
domination have, for now, been laid to rest.
Contrary to the prevailing wisdom, one
of the best indicators of this was the IFP's ability to survive
against the odds, securing 4.5% of the vote with 860, 000 votes.
This gave us a representation of 18 members in the National
Assembly."
The decline in the proportion of votes
for the IFP, said Buthelezi, is due to a combination of the
'Zuma Factor' and other challenges, not least the fact that the
ANC had a R200 million war chest at its disposal, while the IFP
had practically nothing; the IFP was largely ignored by a mainly
hostile media; and it was vulnerable to the ANC's cheque-book
politicking and random acts of electoral irregularities, such as
double and underage voting.
Buthelezi also noted that the IFP has
still not overcome the brilliant tactics of the ANC-in-exile and
its internal associates like the United Democratic Front in
stigmatising the IFP as a Zulu nationalist party and Buthelezi
as a Zulu ethnic entrepreneur post 1979. Buthelezi bemoaned the
fact that "This negative view of the party as 'Zulu only' is popular in academic analyses and is
slavishly replicated in the urban media.'
This is despite the fact that Dr Anthea
Jeffrey offers a meticulous account in the recently published
"People's War" of how the ANC rose to power based on a strategy
learned from Vietnamese and Soviet communists, which combines
propaganda, organisation and violence, in which everyone is
expendable.
In his closing remarks, Buthelezi said
of the IFP: "We are still a significant force in South African
politics. I believe people believe in us and keep faith with us.
As one academic put it: 'If Zuma could not capture these voters
from the IFP, who possibly can?'"
Contact:
Liezl van der Merwe
082 729
2510
|