|
Inkatha Freedom Party Statement By:
MR ERIC LUCAS MP
IFP SPOKESPERSON FOR MINERALS & ENERGY
16 January 2008
There is no
doubt that there is a desperate and urgent need for Eskom to
expand, due to South Africa's booming economy which has seen the
demand for electricity grow faster than government had
anticipated.
Coupled with
the growth in the demand for electricity within our own borders,
we still provide our neighbouring countries such as Botswana,
Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Namibia and Lesotho with electricity.
Providing
neighbouring countries with electricity, when we have power
shortages ourselves, places massive strain on our electricity
grid and the IFP is not sure what benefits, if any, this
practise holds for South Africa.
We are also
extremely concerned about Eskom's plans for expansion and how
they are planning to approach it.
Firstly, the
IFP is concerned with the fact that Eskom is to ask government
for money to help fund its capital expansion programme and avoid
a ratings downgrade, which would translate into higher costs for
consumers.
Secondly, we
know that France and the UK have been invited to tender for the
building of new PBMR plants. But the IFP can't help but wonder:
where will Eskom get the money from if an international tender
is accepted?
The normal
run of the mill for any business would be to check the business
climate, formulate a business plan and then to build and expand
its service.
But now
Eskom expects consumers to pay first, without receiving any
benefits.
And these
are the fundamental concerns of all South Africans.
Eskom, who
has been plagued by numerous problems over the past couple of
years, have consistently paid out performance bonuses to their
management.
Practises
like these, raise questions with the public.
Furthermore,
consumers are now expected to foot the bill for Eskom's
R150-billion infrastructure expansion programme by paying 14%
more for their electricity. South African consumers are already
financially over-burdened with high fuel prices, the high
inflation rate and higher food prices. Then, on top of all of
this, to expect South Africans to pay so much more for their
electricity is unfair.
Therefore,
the IFP would like to suggest that Eskom have a re-look at its
current expansion plan, and maybe consider looking at other
models to attract outside investment into the company.
Eskom should
also actively encourage solar water heating panels for heating
water.
Another
partial solution for our current electricity crisis would be to
look at the daylight savings system. Currently, standard time
for all of South Africa is GMT + 2, even though the country is
wide enough for two time zones. By splitting the country into
two time zones, possibly one hour apart, we would have two
different peak periods in the morning and two different peak
periods in the evening. This could help to significantly spread
the country's electricity demand and could lead to less
load-shedding and hopefully fewer blackouts.
Lastly:
Eskom and municipalities should closely monitor government
buildings if they are serious about saving electricity.
Government buildings are often the biggest electricity wasters,
leaving their lights and other equipment switched on 24/7.
For more
information:
Mr Eric Lucas MP: 082 557 2481
Liezl van der Merwe: 083 611 7470 |