Despite its support for
the overall principles of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of
Unfair Discrimination, the IFP strongly disapproves of the clause in the
Bill, which cites patriarchy as one of the prohibited grounds. The party
rejects lumping patriarchy together with apartheid, as a mother of all
forms of discrimination. Viewing patriarchy as a prohibited ground,
might have serious deleterious consequences for social organisation and
weaken social control. This might affect order and discipline in
families and the whole society.
Prof. G. Ndabandaba, IFP
spokesperson on Justice said: ‘We are all culture bound more or less.
Legislation on aspects of culture like patriarchy is therefore in the
IFP's view an overreach of legislation. We do not deny that the proper
business of this legislation is to prohibit unfair discrimination and to
promote equality. But this noble exercise must not be done at the
expense of culture which, although made by people, in turn makes
people.’
The IFP is also gravely
concerned that equality may not be understood similarly by both the
traditionalist and westernised people. This may result in some conflict
and in interfering with current traditional and religious practices.
Harassment is also defined vaguely and broadly. It could effectively
apply to any perceived lack of good manners or humour or proper human
consideration.
The IFP is happy however,
that it successfully lobbied for the bill to include advanced age as one
of the conditions of being disadvantaged vulnerable. This augurs well
for the future protection of senior citizens.
For Further Information:
Prof. G. Ndabandaba 083 478 5953
IFP Media Office 021-403
3965