KwaZulu Natal Provincial
Parliament:
16 April 2007
Honourable Speaker
It is perfectly natural that on the day of the budget debate
everyone around the table wants more of everything. I, for one, only
ask this government for more common sense and more tolerance.
Probably the most laudable aspect of the national 2007/2008 budget
is its prospect of a budget surplus. Given the spending patterns by
this provincial government, should we in the IFP as the Official
Opposition, favour the surplus because it represents savings in an
economy otherwise starved of saving, or should we argue that the
money would be better spent by the individuals and companies who
supplied it to the government in taxes in the first place?
The obstinacy surrounding the surplus debate reveals this
government's belief, largely unshaken by facts to the contrary, that
it is qualified to spend money better than the taxpayer. This is
nonsense. The government in general and the South African government
in particular is the worst possible spender of the public resources.
Only consider the fruitless and wasteful expenditure ubiquitous
across the government departments in this province and beyond, the
departmental budgets that go unspent amid glaring delivery backlogs
and the astounding administrative cost of this government.
Unless the government can tangibly improve its spending patterns, it
should contemplate giving tax relief to individuals and corporates
which will help them build their own savings and thus tackle the
enormous level of household debt which is currently running at more
than 70 percent of GDP. Even more worrying is the underlying notion
that there are only about 330,000 companies in South Africa that
employ about 5 million people on a pay-as-you-earn (PAYE) basis
while the state sustains about 12 million people on social benefits.
In practice, this means that every firm is, figuratively,
responsible for raising social benefits for at least 36 people. If
we are to widen our social network, as the government - with thumbs
up from the Official Opposition - intends doing, we have to
transform this precarious ratio and boost the number of businesses
providing employment and funnelling PAYE taxes to the South African
Revenue Service each month by granting more tax breaks. This is best
international practice this government so often presumes to follow!
In the light of all this, it is tragic that this government carries
on treating the taxpayer with so much disdain. Time and again the
IFP has bemoaned in this House the vast sums wasted on
government-sponsored izimbizo and related initiatives which aspire
to promote participatory democracy but do little more than promote
the ruling party and boost its prospects of being re-elected in 2009
- at taxpayer's expense. These initiatives, often duplicated by
parliament and multiple government departments, continue to drain
the state resources, that are desperately needed elsewhere, without
any concurrent process of monitoring and evaluating their efficiency
and effectiveness.
Yes, let me say it openly, Honourable Speaker, it is the ruling
party's political greed that determines the management of state
funds in this province rather than the needs and aspirations of the
people of KwaZulu Natal. The truth is that the ANC has never really
accepted the multi-party character of the political scene in KwaZulu
Natal, perhaps because it has never been seriously challenged
outside this province. There would be nothing wrong with trashing
the Official Opposition - this, in fact, is the very stuff of
politics - if the state resources were not being used, consistently
and relentlessly, to improve the image and standing of the ruling
party on the ground.
The ANC has been waging a war against its opponents even on the most
deplorable, that is personal level. The ruling party has invested a
huge amount of political capital into undermining the mandate of the
Leader in this House by trying to isolate Dr Lionel Mtshali from his
party. To no avail, I must say. To me, all this frenetic energy
directed against the Official Opposition means that the IFP must be
doing something right in exposing the mismanagement and fraud in
this government, as we have recently done in the disastrous
Department of Agriculture and Environmental Affairs.
One last example of how this government uses the state resources as
a stick against its - often imagined - opponents. As this House will
recall, the ANC piloted legislation which sought to restructure the
institution of traditional leadership in KwaZulu Natal, presumably
for more democratic ends. It may be unknown to the ruling party but
our traditional institutions have always possessed many of the
elements of modern political systems such as the concepts of
democracy, accountability and freedom of expression. A traditional
leader’s authority is valid only insofar as he is the mouthpiece of
the interests of people within his area of jurisdiction.
It has always been my party's view that popular influence of
amakhosi would never be diminished. Traditional institutions have
legitimacy and authority that post-colonial and post- apartheid
governments have yet to attain. They have remained virtually
indispensable to the fabric of our culture. The very survival and
continuing resilience of the institution of traditional leadership,
despite centuries of colonial and undemocratic rule and repeated
attempts to undermine the traditional governance systems, bears
testimony to the extraordinary tenacity and vitality of our
traditions.
Of course, the most recent wholesale attack by the government of the
day against the institution is the fact that the application of the
KwaZulu-Natal Traditional Leadership and Governance Act has not been
budgeted for. Virtually all expenditure ensuing from this
legislation, such as the establishment of district Houses, will
inevitably be irregular and unauthorised. This situation is entirely
unique to KwaZulu Natal. Having to operate on a shoe-string budget
is bound to diminish rather than enhance the status of our
traditional leadership and I challenge this government to admit it
and do something about it.
I thank you.
Contact: Blessed Gwala, 078 690 5777