Today is a great day in Port Shepstone. Today we have
come to Port Shepstone to unleash the hope of the people of Port Shepstone. The
people of Port Shepstone have the strength to hope for a better future. The
people of Port Shepstone have the right to fulfil their hope for a better
future.
We are here to begin a process which will transform
today's hope into tomorrow's reality.
The whole of South Africa is ready for a change for the
better. For too long the problems of South Africa have been ignored. South
Africa is suffering under the yoke of grave problems. Our people are dying by
the hundreds of thousands because of HIV/AIDS. Millions of people are affected
or infected by HIV/AIDS. Their plight could have been bettered long ago, if
they had been supplied with the full measure of treatment which medical science
has made available.
Tens of thousands of people would be alive today had they
received the treatment they were entitled to. Tens of thousands of children
would not now be orphans had our government woken up earlier to the problem of
HIV/AIDS and the plight of those who are suffering from it. However, even in
the middle of such great despair, there is now hope. The IFP has created that
hope. The IFP has manufactured that hope.
Today we are here to strengthen the IFP and to launch a
call to strengthen the IFP both provincially and nationwide so that hope may
triumph.
Had it not been for the IFP, hope would not exist for
many people who are now suffering from HIV/AIDS. It is because of the IFP that
hope will triumph. We had to fight and struggle to achieve this result. We have
not achieved the full measure of what is needed. We need more strength and
greater support for the IFP in order to complete the job which remains
unfinished. I was one of the first people in Parliament to state that
government policies on HIV/AIDS were flawed. I have been extremely active in
pushing for a change of policy.
Over and over again in debates, I advocated that
Government should not decide on matters of medicine, which ought to be left to
medical doctors. It is not for Government to decide whether HIV causes AIDS and
whether the drugs available for the treatment of its symptoms are safe or not.
Only in the old autocratic and obscurantist communist Russia was government
determining matters of science on the basis of political party policies.
Over and over again, the IFP has tried and succeeded in
bringing pragmatism and morality into politics. It was the IFP's Premier of
KwaZulu Natal, on instruction of our National Council and in close
co-ordination with me, who challenged the policy of not giving Nevirapine to
mothers, to prevent the transmission of HIV/AIDS to their newborn babies.
He had to go so far as to intervene in a litigation
before the highest court in the land, the Constitutional Court, to plead that
it be allowed to do what the conscience and morality of any decent politician
should dictate. He had to go to the Constitutional Court to plead that this
Province be allowed to save its children by the hundreds of thousands. On the
strength of the IFP, a wave of hope and moral regeneration has risen which
demands that the problem of HIV/AIDS be taken seriously.
The South African people must think very seriously about
how the problem of HIV/AIDS would have been dealt with more sensibly and
appropriately, had the IFP been in power. Had the IFP been in power at national
level, funding would have been made available a long time ago to provide for as
many who need it as possible, with any type of treatment available to deal with
HIV/AIDS and its symptoms.
The central government has recently reached the same
conclusion, but ten years later and, may be ten years too late. This delay has
paved our cemeteries with endless graves and our families with untold sorrows.
This is not the first and only time that the IFP has had to sway the ruling
Party from its original position. On each occasion it moved away from its
original position to embrace the IFP's position, but did so half-heartedly,
haphazardly and with half-baked solutions. In the end, South Africa as a whole
has suffered enormously. We have watched just this last week the machinations
of the ANC's Spokesperson, Mr. Mtholeophi Mthimkhulu who accused the IFP of the
very things that his party is guilty of, concerning failure to make
anti-retroviral drugs available.
Had the IFP been empowered to govern, South Africa would
not have suffered.
We are here to allow the hope to spring that a change may
occur which enables the IFP to make a much stronger contribution towards the
governance of South Africa. The IFP does not wish to govern by itself. Ours is
not a quest for power, for the sake of power. We wish to be the catalyst of a
broad coalition which enables the South African people to become the
protagonists and the rulers of their own government. Our role is to enable the
South African people to govern. The IFP by itself cannot solve all of South
Africa's problems. However, as the spearhead of a coalition of willing parties
which lead a revolution of goodwill, the IFP, together with the South African
people, can indeed, solve most of South Africa's problems.
Together, we have the strength and resources to solve
most of the many problems confronting South Africa. However, we must break the
ANC's grip on power to ensure that the politics of divisions and exclusions are
replaced by the politics of co-operation and unity. In this context, it will be
possible for the voice of sanity which the IFP represents, to be heard more
loudly, and with greater political resonance.
South Africa can no longer afford that our voice be heard
only partially, and then soon forgotten. As few as ten years ago, the ANC still
held strong socialist views and espoused a notion of a command economy, which
would have spelled out disaster for South Africa. Step by step they began
embracing the IFP's economic views. We have always believed in the importance
of free-market enterprise and the need for fostering economic growth by
liberalising market forces and unleashing the huge hidden potentials in the
South African economy.
Step by step the ANC has recognised the wisdom of this
approach and has crossed over the fence from socialism into the ways of the
modern and pragmatic world. However, one often sees that they crossed over the
fence with their brain and have left their heart on the other side of it.
Therefore, whenever courage, determination and political will are required to
implement hard but necessary drastic measures, they run back to where they have
left their heart, which is in the land of autocratic solutions shaped in the
shadows of the defunct soviet system. In all this somersaulting It is the
allies of the ANC, Cosatu and the South African Communists Party, who are
continually putting a spanner into the works, as far as full privatization is
concerned.
For this reason, they have not been able to go the full
measure of what is required to promote economic growth. The ANC has embraced
fiscal discipline and run a State budget in a manner which is sufficiently
fiscally responsible, but have stopped short of moving ahead with liberalizing
our economy, promoting productivity, creating flexibility in the labour market
and providing real incentives for economic growth. Their failure to do so is
immediately connected to the hundreds and thousands of South Africans who have
lost their jobs since 1994. Because their heart still dreams in a land of a
socialist utopia, more than half a million South Africans have lost the
security, dignity and support of their jobs and their families are
suffering.
Since 1991, I have tabled in our debates the need to
promote privatisation at the fastest possible speed, and on the basis of an
economic, rather than political process. Also in this respect, they recognized
the wisdom of what the IFP was proposing but they implemented only a small
portion of what was required, to the point of not even wanting to call
privatisation by its name, choosing to camouflage it under the different name
of the restructuring of State assets. It is again the COSATU/SACP axis who are
cramping their style.
Once again, the ANC recognized that the IFP had the right
medicine to heal South Africa's many ailments but, like a recalcitrant and
spoilt child, they decided to take only half the measure of the required
medicine. Because of this, the South African people continue to suffer. We must
now ask ourselves whether the time has not come to give strength to our hope
and empower a new leadership which has the sufferings of South Africans at
heart, and is willing to do what it takes to make South Africa succeed, without
being held to ransom by the Trade Unions Barons and the South African Communist
Party.
It is not for me to decide who should rule South Africa.
It is for the South African people to make such a decision. Our priority is to
move out of this rally with the message to all the South African people that it
is for them to make their voices heard in nine months, when the next elections
are going to be held. We must now plant the seed which conceives a process of
gestation of a new great revolution in the making, which can bring hope to
power in nine months. If I believe that hope can triumph, you must believe it
with me. I believe that you all believe that hope may triumph.
Port Shepstone believes that hope can triumph. If,
together, we can make Port Shepstone, KwaZulu Natal and South Africa believe
that hope can, and will, triumph, then indeed, hope shall triumph. Politics is
the only place in which by virtue of the strength of our shared beliefs, we can
profoundly transform reality and make our own belief become tomorrow's
reality.
We need to ensure that all South Africans feel that they
do have this power in their hands and that they carry the obligation to
exercise it in nine months time. If they fail to do so, hope will die. If, in
nine months, they fail to express what they believe in, then the possibility
for a change will become elusive and Port Shepstone, KwaZulu Natal and South
Africa will be bound to five more years of the same in an ever-generating
spiral of unemployment, crime, corruption and problems such as HIV/AIDS, which
are dealt with, not through actions, but by means of denial.
We need a government which governs by facing up to and
solving issues, not a government which eludes the duty of governing by
pretending that problems do not exist, or that they might just go away. For too
long the HIV/AIDS problem has not been given the attention it deserves, whilst
people were dying. For the moment there is no clarity on whether Government
has, in fact, decided to roll out 100% cover of anti-retroviral drugs, or only
50% or 20%. At present we have no idea when such roll-out will begin. There is
no reason why they should not have begun yesterday, but there are views that it
ought only to begin in July 2004.
I do not understand why people who are in desperate need
of medicine, should wait for eleven months and, coincidentally enough, they
should get their relief after elections. One must almost fear that this might
be another example of the well-known pattern of promising, before elections,
for delivery after elections, which delivery never takes place. The people who
are suffering with HIV/AIDS do not require further denials or empty promises.
They are saying very simply : show me the drugs!
Similarly, South African people are tired of hearing
denials of the escalating situation of crime and lawlessness. We have all been
victims of crime. I have been the victim of crime. My colleagues have been the
victims of crime. It doesn't seem to stop. It doesn't seem to regress.
Crime is an ever-growing industry. This problem is not
going to be solved by hiding crime statistics. The South African people are
asking government to show concrete measures. Crime can, and must, be solved. We
need more policemen who are better paid, have better resources and are better
trained.
We need more court rooms and more judges. We also need a
massive campaign of education in all our communities to break the yoke of the
culture of crime. We need to teach people to become good citizens and to give
them a way out of the criminal mind-set. We need widespread programmes of civic
education in our schools, workplaces and communities. All this is not beyond
the capacity of our Government. It is not beyond the resources of our country.
It is not beyond what our State spends on dealing with other priorities which,
in real or imaginary terms, are threatening the lives of our people. It is not
a matter of money. It is just a matter of political will. Our people are dying
by the tens of thousands because of crime.
They are dying by the hundreds of thousands because of
HIV/AIDS. These are problems we can solve and we have got the money to do so.
We must create the change which is now necessary to muster the political will
which has thus far been lacking.
Our Republic is suffering. We need a profound moral
regeneration to heal it. Our Republic is suffering because of corruption. The
rule of law is not being upheld. Party political interest seems to override the
rule of law. The expression "corrupted comrades" has become part of
the new jargon of our democracy. All this is unacceptable, and unless stopped,
will spell out the failure of our democracy.
This is not the country for which I fought for more than
fifty years of political struggle. I have always dreamt of a country which is
free under the rule of law, and in which no one is allowed to escape from, or
break, the law. We fought for the liberation of all South Africans, not for the
enrichment of a few. We fought to build a country in which one day all South
Africans may enjoy the same levels of economic prosperity and social stability
which were once reserved only for a small rich and white minority.
We must pursue that dream and heal our ailing Republic.
In order to do so, the IFP must be stronger and a coalition of like-minded
parties must give hope for democratic renewal. We need democratic renewal
because we are now set to have five or ten more years of the same, which will
spell out the death of our democracy. We need to change course towards a better
direction and become agents of change.
We cannot rely on the ruling party to become an agent of
change in its own strength and volition. Our democracy requires that the ANC be
cut down to below the 49% threshold. South Africa requires a broad-based
coalition of forces, which can only be empowered if the South African people
have the wisdom to cut the ANC down to below 49%. It is not for my sake that
this needs to be done. It needs to be done for the health and viability of that
democracy for which we have fought for so many generations. There is no doubt
that we are witnessing the gestation of an embryonic one-party State.
The ANC has mustered a 66% majority, not by virtue of the
will of the people, but by means of political machinations and intrigues. With
the strength of its 66% majority, the ANC now has the unfettered power to amend
the Constitution. Our Constitution, for which we all fought so hard, has become
irrelevant and can no longer protect us. This is not a fear. This is not a
theory. This is not a threat. It is an undeniable reality which was proven by
the fact that as soon as the ANC obtained the unfettered power to amend the
Constitution, it exercised that power in the most reprehensible manner to gain
more power for itself. The ANC amended the Constitution to allow the
crossing-of-the-floor and change the rules of the electoral game, whilst the
game was being played.
The Constitutional Court had declared that the
legislation allowing the crossing of the floor after an election had taken
place, was unconstitutional. The ANC did not care about that and merely changed
the Constitution. They were ready to change the Constitution to such an extent
that they made provision for a retrospective section, which would have enabled
pre-identified people to be brought back into the KwaZulu Natal Legislature
from which they had been expelled, because of their attempt of crossing the
floor, under the unconstitutional legislation. This was a case of tampering
with the Constitution of the worst type I have ever seen.
There was no public policy reason or need. It was about
one thing, and one thing only, which was the ANC's ambition of seizing KwaZulu
Natal, not through the ballot box, not through the will of the people, not
through an election, but through tricks and legislative edicts. The ANC was not
stopped in its tracks by the wave of moral indignation which arose throughout
the country against this retrospective legislation.
The ANC did not heed the moral call which emerged through
each and every responsible newspaper and opinion-maker, calling on them to
exercise restraint. They were hell-bent on getting KwaZulu Natal, by hook or by
crook. They were only stopped when the people of KwaZulu Natal stopped them.
They were only stopped when the Premier of KwaZulu Natal and the IFP were about
to push the button which would have set in place an irretrievable process
leading to an early provincial election in KwaZulu Natal.
Even as I speak to you now, Mr. Ndebele, the ANC Leader
in this Province, is involved in fierce negotiations with smaller Political
Parties, in the KwaZulu Natal Legislature in his determination to become
Premier of the Province, before next year's elections. He does not want any
change that must take place to happen through the electoral process, but
through promises of patronage and more.
One of these meetings has been scheduled by Mr. Ndebele
for tomorrow, this in itself smack of political corruption of sorts.
The IFP has fought by the rules, to protect the rules. We
resorted to the Constitution to protect the Constitution, which protects the
freedoms and liberties of all South Africans. It was just seven hours before
the IFP, with its allies in the Democratic Alliance, were about to pass a
resolution to dissolve the KwaZulu Natal Legislature and trigger an early
election, that the ANC agreed to withdraw the retrospective provision in its
constitutional amendment. In the end, the ANC feared the verdict of the people
of KwaZulu Natal. It feared how the people would have spoken if an election had
been held early this year. It was a great triumph for democracy and yet, a very
saddening moment for all of us, because it gave the final proof that the ANC,
or for that matter any other political party with the unfettered majority to
amend the Constitution, cannot be trusted.
We must now bring back hope to our democracy. We must
infuse new hope in our Constitution. We must stop the gestation of the
embryonic one-party State. There are no known cures against a one-party State.
Once a one-party State has been consolidated it will need to run its course
before it dies off, and as it does so, it will strangle our economy, squeeze
our freedom dry and pillage the country. The only way of dealing with a
one-party State is through prevention. There is no cure for it. We are the
prophylactic. This medicine must be administered in large doses at the next
elections to cut the ANC down to a size which does not threaten democracy, and
to empower the IFP and its allies.
We are moving forward in bringing democracy to South
Africa. Today, Port Shepstone flies the IFP flag. Tomorrow, the whole of South
Africa will see more IFP flags flying in its stadiums, community halls and
streets. Ours is not a flag which wants to divide people. Ours is a flag which
wants to unite all South Africans of goodwill. With no doubt nor hesitation, if
I were the next President of South Africa, I would invite into my Cabinet, both
Mr Leon, who is now the Leader of the Opposition, as well as whichever
representative the ANC may choose to contribute.
I say this because I feel that South Africa must overcome
the politics of division, and must bring on board whatever each party has to
provide towards the better governance of South Africa. We need to forge a
long-term vision on how the country needs to develop. We are competing in a
global market which leaves no space for second acts and second-rate
performances. We must make South Africa perform at its best.
I know that South Africans have the strength, wisdom and
the determination to out-perform any other country of the world. We lack and
need training. We lack and need infrastructures. We need a long-term vision to
bridge the gap between the extraordinary strength of the South African soul and
mind, and all the things we do not have and which we need, to make South Africa
a first-class performer. This long-term vision can only be formed on the basis
of a social compact which brings all South Africans of goodwill together, to
join hands together, to work together, not only today, but for the next 25
years that it might take to transform our vision into a new reality. We need a
leadership capable of bringing this vision together and driving it through to
success.
Since its inception, the IFP has always embraced the
politics of inclusion, and never that of exclusion. We became the victim of
those who waged war against us, because they were pursuing the politics of
exclusion. We became the targets of their violence and intimidation, because
they could not embrace our vision of a unified and peaceful South Africa.
Throughout my life I have brought people together from across different walks
of life.
In 1980 I brought people together across the then deep
racial divides and in this Province we gave birth to the Buthelezi Commission.
In 1983 I brought together the Black Alliance to oppose the divisive politics
of the tri-cameral system because I believe in the politics of unity. In 1986 I
launched the KwaZulu Natal Indaba which, in defiance of any law or paradigm of
the time, brought the people of this Province together across racial and social
divides, so that together we could take responsibility to govern this Province.
In this Province the first inter-racial government of South Africa was born in
the form of the Joint Executive Authority of KwaZulu Natal.
Since 1996 I have been preaching the need for a
revolution of goodwill to promote reconciliation and bring together all the
people of goodwill across existing political divides. For this reason, the IFP
is uniquely qualified to bring together all the springs of hope which are
breaking through the sands of the present desert-like landscape of politics in
which, until now, disillusionment, despair and indifference seem to be
prevailing. There is now hope for those who felt that politics had nothing to
offer to them anymore. The hope is that we can, indeed, produce a leadership
capable of and willing to take head-on and solve the problems of crime,
unemployment, corruption, poverty and HIV/AIDS.
Existing political parties do not necessarily represent
how people feel. The next elections should not be about political parties, but
rather about enabling people to send out a loud and clear message to those in
government, to let them know how they feel. For this reason, it is essential
that all those who are here today take it upon themselves to become ambassadors
of goodwill. You must move out of here and tell the people of South Africa that
they have a last chance to get our country right. You must tell the people of
South Africa that they must vote at the next election, and that they must do so
in order to have their voice heard. Voting cannot be an act of allegiance. It
cannot be the expression of an ancient debt of gratitude.
Those who voted for the ANC in the past are not bound to
do so again, unless they want to have five more years of the same. If they have
the strength to hope and the will to change, they, themselves, must change how
they vote.
It is your responsibility to tell the South African
people that they are free to vote as they choose, and that they must vote to
make South Africa change so that our children may, indeed, have a better life
than the one we now have. Dare we not bequeath on our children the legacy of
the HIV/AIDS genocide, rampant and ever-escalating crime, growing unemployment,
unfettered corruption and rising levels of poverty.
Dare we not look into the face of these problems and do
nothing about it. Dare we not fail to have the courage to demand and produce
change. The power to change lies in the power to vote, and to vote differently.
Since its inception, the IFP motto has been "democracy means the power to
choose". The time has come for this motto to change South Africa by making
people realize that, indeed, they have this power on election day.
There are times in which leaders are the protagonists of
history and it is their responsibility to make history unfold in one direction
or the other.
Most of the liberation movement was driven by leaders
with the support of their people. The time has now arrived in which it is for
the people to lead. Today, the people are providing their leadership by
choosing to make Port Shepstone an IFP city, which is committed to change and
is willing to be a champion in our struggle for change. When elections come,
the South African people will be called on to lead the course of history and
become their leader's leader. I am a servant of the people.
Throughout my life I have done nothing but serve the will
of the people. I have been with the people all my life and never abandoned
them. I know what the people need, because my heart beats at the same pace as
their needs and aspirations. I know that South Africa needs more economic
growth, more employment, less crime, less corruption, more attention to rural
areas and rural poverty and far much more attention to the HIV/AIDS pandemic. I
know that the South African people need less excuses, less denial, less
enrichment and less high-flying parasites.
We need the IFP to lead a campaign of moral regeneration,
based on hard work and the willingness to serve. I am here to serve. The IFP is
here to serve. With our service the people will triumph.
May God inspire us to better serve the people. May God
inspire the people to become the leaders of South Africa and empower it to
change. May God bless South Africa and its wonderful people. May God bless you
and your families.