First of all - I would like to offer my
congratulations to every one of you on the local SADESMO team who
has worked hard to bring about the fantastic result in last week's
SRC elections at the University of Zululand. By winning all seven
seats on the university's student body, you have set an example for
all of us in the IFP to follow in next year's general election. Well
done!
To me, coming to the University of Zululand
is like coming home. This institution is in many ways a
personification of what I passionately believe in. I probably will
not exaggerate if I call it my brain child.
The establishment of this university marked
the culmination of my fundraising efforts as Chief Minister of
KwaZulu. My vision of an educational institution for black students,
needless to say, was not the most popular idea at the time. Through
first-class education, Unizul brought a beam of enlightenment into
an era of darkness and beyond.
But, as you can imagine, it was not all
smooth sailing. The folly of apartheid policies on education for
non-white children was duly matched by one particular ANC struggle
response. Their slogan Liberation before Education saw a whole
generation of black school children marching into the 1980s intoning
these words like an incantation. I myself had no doubt at the time
that it was designed, like most incantations, to save our youth from
the tiresome obligation to think for themselves. Of course, nothing
could have offered starker contrast to this blatant social
irresponsibility than Inkatha's retort Education before Liberation.
But this is now history. Let me strike a more contemporary note.
Over the past fourteen years - the lifetime
of our democratic South Africa - higher education in this province
and the country has been experiencing a period of intense ferment.
Institutions of higher learning, which by tradition are conservative
bodies, have had to contend with rapid, imposing and often dramatic
change. In a way, the period since 1994 has been a time of optimism.
The new government came in with an agenda of
change and transformation. It began reshaping South African
society and formulating a new vision. Universities were key
instruments in this agenda. They were where the new democracy's
idealism found expression, its leaders trained and its ideas
originated and grew. All seemed set for a direct, if not smooth,
path.
And yet the system that was inherited from
the apartheid regime was inherently unequal. In many ways, its
academic input was frequently outdated and out of step with the
emerging concepts in the new, democratic South Africa. Its research
culture was often incompatible with the progressive agenda of the
new country and the culture of the academic environment was
alienating to a large majority of South Africans, black, Indian,
coloured and white.
In addition to the inherited shortcomings,
the interventions by the new educational establishment, although no
doubt well-meant, have not always had the desired effect. For the
most part, these interventionists miscalculated, because they
treated universities as mere weapons in an ideological battle. By
establishing hegemony over the tertiary educational institutions,
they reached the end of their ambition, not a means to further it.
Our - that is the IFP vision - of technikons
and universities and their place in society has always been more
realistic. By convention and in our view, tertiary learning stands
at the centre of society's self understanding. It holds the records
of its history and values. On this basis, it aspires to formulate
the society's future prospects. As such, tertiary education has to
be open to change and challenge. It has to take calculated risks and
it has to embrace the new and the progressive.
We in the IFP have always recognised that
one of the novel concepts tertiary educational institutions in South
Africa and elsewhere in the world need to tackle is redefining their
core mission in society. This obligation is even more pertinent now,
fourteen years into our democratic dispensation, when the
fundamental constitutional questions our country struggled with for
decades prior to 1994 have been settled. There is much beyond
the post-apartheid transformation that needs to be addressed in
South African tertiary institutions today.
For one, the core mission of a South African
institution of higher learning no longer seems to be the mere
creation of new knowledge and the construction of an intellectual
society. We recognise that the cultivation of knowledge can take
place anywhere where people gather to trade ideas and challenges: in
the marketplace of ideas, at the manufacturing plant, in the
executive boardroom. As a result, the elitism of tertiary learning
is receding fast in the face of this new competition. The tertiary
institutions should welcome and embrace it and, in the process, put
up a decent fight for its place in today's world.
In order to advance some of these ideas and
prompt them into practice at the Unizul, SADESMO must agitate and
mobilise for improvement and reform. You have now won a popular
mandate to do so. Along with the improvement of educational content,
such as curriculum enhancement and course diversification, the
improvement of teaching methods and other aspects of teaching are
vital to the qualitative enhancement of tertiary education. These
objectives can only be achieved as a concerted effort of students,
management and academics. Let SADESMO be the driving force in this
alliance.
We in the IFP will count on your expertise,
experience and zeal in the upcoming political battle in KwaZulu
Natal that is the 2009 election.
The IFP is determined to take back the
province from the ANC. Our resolve has been incensed as much by our
loss of power in 2004 as by the ANC's mismanagement of the public
affairs since. In order to prepare the ground for 2009, we must
agitate and mobilise for change here and now.
You have taken the first step and inspired
us all.
Once again I congratulate and thank you.
Contact:
Jon Cayzer, 084 555 7144