Programme Director, Mr B V Mthetwa, Uthungulu District
Chairman of the IFP, Mr S V Naicker MPP, men and women of goodwill from the
business sector, my brothers and sisters from the Indian community and comrades
from the National Teachers Union.
I am delighted that at long last Mr S V Naicker's dream
has been realized. It took a lot of patience and perseverance for this meeting
to be realized. Mr S V Naicker is endowed with the attributes which have
contributed to the success of this meeting. I accordingly commend him for a job
well done. I do not for a moment imply that Mr S V Naicker has been working
single-handed. Fellow comrade B V Mthetwa and the Uthungulu District leadership
have played their part. We accordingly thank them.
This meeting is held twenty days before the eventful day
i.e. the election day on 14 April 2004. I need not remind you that this will be
an epoch making election. The fate of democracy in this province and in our
country will be finally decided at the polls in KwaZulu Natal. Put differently
KwaZulu Natal is the battlefield for democracy in this country. Thus every man
and woman of goodwill has a moral obligation to play a significant role which
will ensure a resounding electoral victory for the IFP. We pride ourselves that
we are the champions of democracy. It will thus be a fitting tribute that we be
empowered by voters to entrench democracy in this country. Whoever intends
abstaining from voting shall contribute to the entrenchment of the ANC hegemony
which we regard as a threat to democracy. I earnestly appeal to all men and
women of goodwill to go to the polls on April 14. Every man and women of
goodwill should have a stake in the transport arrangements to be put in place
by this district to up the voter turn out.
I am not convinced that all of us within the City of
Umhlathuze are aggressively marketing the IFP as the party to be voted into
power. I am looking forward to the setting up of IFP tables displaying our
election material including our manifestos at all shopping malls within our
city. There is no reason why walk-abouts should not be conducted. One would
expect that house- to - house campaigns will be conducted.
The IFP is committed to a peaceful election. We are
champions of peace and tolerance. We declare that every party is free to
campaign without any impediments placed on its way, without any acts of
intimidation and violence being displayed. We remain committed to the Electoral
Code of Conduct. We accordingly reject with all contempt any statements which
associate us with violence during the election campaign. It is a gross insult
for any editor of a credible paper to accuse the IFP of benefiting from
political violence.
All citizens of our beloved country are proud of our 1996
Constitution. It is this basic law of our country which provides for the Bill
of Rights. All our fundamental rights are protected by law. Any infringement
thereof is contestable in any of our courts of law. May I remind those who have
conveniently forgotten that every citizen enjoys the following rights : the
right to social grants, the right to housing and the right to development. No
sane person can ever place these rights in jeopardy. Public funds voted by
parliament should be expended equitably to uphold these rights.
The issues of this election campaign have not been chosen
by political parties. In fact, it might be the first time in our recent history
that the issues of this election have been chosen by the South African people.
This is reflected in the fact that all political parties are effectively
running on the same issues and attempts to shift discussions away from them
have failed.
The election campaign is about the issues of HIV/AIDS,
crime, unemployment, corruption and poverty in rural areas. These issues are
very well known to all South Africans and need no explanation. In one way or
the other, all our families are suffering because of them. These issues
represent the areas in which the ANC government has failed to deliver during
the past ten years in general, and during the past five years in particular.
We are all directly or indirectly affected or infected by
HIV/AIDS. We are facing an holocaust of unprecedented dimension, while our
ruling class is dealing with it by means of public relation campaigns while
delaying the roll out of a medical and social emergency plan. Crime has been
out of control for years but the ruling class has first denied the existence of
this problem and has then tried to trivialize it. I know of no South African
who has not been a victim of crime, or does not live in fear of becoming one.
The situation in rural areas has deteriorated in many respects in the past ten
years, because of the collapse of subsistence agriculture and food security.
Conversely, corruption has increased and with it the perception of impunity.
Corruption has developed at the highest level of government and is permeating
many levels of our administration. It has also infiltrated itself in many
sectors of our civil society and is becoming a cancer, gradually eating away at
our social and economic life.
Unemployment has grown from 29% to 40% and there is no
credible plan to generate employment, other than those put forward by the IFP
and the DA. Our country still does not have a plan to accelerate its rate of
economic growth. We need to develop a new industrial basis for South Africa,
which can explain to all of us how we as a country are going to earn a living
in the age of globalization. The world does not owe us a living and we need to
identify now what type of products our country will bring into the global
markets in twenty years. We believe that South Africa has the opportunity of
becoming an excellent country while, as it stands, it seems to be destined to
remain a mediocre one because government has failed to formulate a long-term
vision for its growth and development.
These are the real problems of South Africa, both as they
are and as people perceive them. It is significant that there is a great degree
of accuracy on how people are perceiving our problems. These are the five areas
in respect of which the ANC government has been particularly negligent. The
next elections are going to be about how these problems are to be solved. If
the South African people wish to have five more years of the same neglect, they
can continue to empower the ANC. The IFP and the DA have come together to give
the South African people the hope of a democratic alternative. They are a
government in waiting. It is for the South African people to have the courage
to elect it.
If one reviews our proposals, it is obvious that by
working together, the IFP and the DA can produce a million real job
opportunities. We have a long-term vision on how to get the country to work.
Our solutions are not easy and we will ask the South African people to walk the
uphill road towards prosperity, which will call for sacrifice, social
discipline, productivity and long-term commitments. The old South Africa was
built with the blood and sweat of all, but for the benefit of a few privileged
members of the white community. We feel that a prosperous new South Africa will
need to be built with the sacrifice and contribution of all, but this time for
the equitable benefit of all. This is more than a cliche. It is an actual plan
of action which calls for a new social contract amongst all South Africans. The
IFP-DA coalition are the seeds of this contract.
If we look at KwaZulu Natal, it is obvious that the
IFP-DA coalition has already produced tangible results, in terms of better
governance and increased delivery in the short time span of two years. If the
same parties were to become the next government of South Africa, the whole of
the country could become a really extraordinary place. We firmly believe that
Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi would be an extraordinary President and under his
presidency, South Africa would be an extraordinary country. We must have the
courage to conceive a dream which is larger than our present horizons, because
on election day the South African people have indeed the power to make miracles
happen. We believe that the miracle of a democratic alternative is necessary
for the whole of South Africa.
Our democracy is in great jeopardy. The signs are there
for everyone to see, even though many prefer ignoring them. We are witnessing
the rapid consolidation of an embryonic one-party state. Among the issues of
this election is indeed whether our democracy is to move forward or backward.
KwaZulu Natal has become the battlefield on which the survival of our democracy
will be tested. The ANC changed the Constitution to allow elected
representatives to cross the floor, in spite of the fact that they were elected
on a different type of mandate. Crossing of the floor is allowed in many
countries but it is unheard of that political representatives elected on the
basis of one system could change the terms of their mandate in midstream. It is
obvious that the ANC is willing to change the Constitution, not only at will
but even at whim to accommodate its desire to control all centres of power in
the country.
If this happens the dialectics of democracy will suffer
and it might take twenty years before there could be again a variety of centres
of power at work in our country. Today KwaZulu Natal is the only government
left which has the autonomy to create different policies and think differently
from the centre. We gave proof of the importance of such an autonomy in respect
of our policy to distribute anti-retroviral drugs to prevent mother-to-child
transmission of HIV/AIDS. In so doing we corrected what was a tragic policy of
the central government, which dealt with our country's greatest tragedy with
almost criminal neglect. Democracy is exactly about different provinces and
levels of government being able to correct one another's mistakes through
competition of efforts and ideas. Our democracy stands to become stifled if the
ANC is not cut down to size. It would be important for our country that no
political party had the power to unilaterally change our Constitution.
These are all challenges before the South African people.
At the next elections the South African people must choose whether they really
wish the issues of HIV/AIDS, unemployment, crime, corruption and poverty to be
solved. Whether they want more or less democracy. Whether they want people in
power who rule through ideology and empty promises or people who act and
deliver.
The ANC is moved by ideology, not pragmatism. For
instance, their proposal to open up the country to any foreigner coming from
the whole of Africa, China, Russia and India, in addition to another host of
countries, is nothing short of irresponsible. South Africa needs to be thankful
to Minister Buthelezi who stopped such a proposal and enabled a process to take
place which will put it up for public scrutiny, rather than being adopted
through by means of a Cabinet decision and in violation of a process of public
participation. There is no doubt that if the country were open, up to 2.9
billion people from some of the poorest and most volatile regions in the world,
every community would be overrun by unneeded immigrants who are not beneficial
to our country. We are in favour of beneficial immigration, but we know that no
other country has waived visa requirements the way the Minister of Foreign
Affairs and the President wanted to.
The South African people must reflect on these matters as
they are very concerning. South Africa needs the pragmatist and visionary
leadership of Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi.
The next elections should be about
what type of leadership South Africa needs. We strongly feel that the solution
to many South African problems lies in the measure and quality of leadership
that Minister Buthelezi and his partners can provide to our country.
On the day
of election each political party is entitled to appeal to the South African
people to ensure that its leader may become the next President.
The IFP is no
exception.