My dear
friends and fellow South Africans,
The appointment of the colourful
KwaZulu-Natal transport and community safety and
liaison MEC Bheki Cele to replace Jackie Selebi as
national police commissioner has, at least, put the
issue of fighting crime back in the national
spotlight. The IFP has robustly stated that we would
have preferred a non-partisan career policeman or
policewoman to have been appointed. But as Mr Cele
has been appointed we must, for the sake of the
police service and SA, wish him well.
Mr Cele has come into this new
position with 'guns blazing', so to speak.
Unfortunately, he is standing by his maiden
statement that police should "shoot to kill".
Section 13(3)(b) of the South African Police
Services Act says: "Where a member who performs an
official duty is authorised by law to use force, he
or she may use only the minimum force which is
reasonable in the circumstances."
When a politician steps onto the
scene of a national emergency, he knows to strike
boldly - to say something new in a display of power
to get the job done. But the fight against crime
doesn't need a politician, it needs a policeman. A
career policeman with greater experience would
affirm the truth captured in the SAPS crime report
for 2008, that "When the police start implementing a
new strategy, criminals will endeavour to adapt to
the new circumstances".
Can we afford to have criminals
adapting to a "shoot to kill" policy?
Rather than deterring crime, could
this policy raise the bar on the level of violence
accompanying crime in South Africa? Have our veteran
police considered this possibility, and could that
be the reason why Mr Cele's predecessors have not
gone in this direction?
Did Mr Cele carefully consider the
statistics and best practice before choosing this
stance as the new National Commissioner? If he is
acting on experience alone, one must pause to
question why the crime statistics for KwaZulu Natal
during his time as MEC for Transport and Community
Safety do not inspire much hope for our national
fight.
During 2007/2008, KwaZulu Natal
recorded a 9,1% increase in car hijackings, a 30,5%
increase in robberies at residential premises and a
shocking 92,9% increase in robberies at business
premises. Under the MEC's watch, the province
experienced a 27,4% increase in people driving under
the influence of alcohol or drugs.
The seriousness of organised crime
was personally brought home to me again last week
when my grandson was abducted in Durban by drug
lords.
My grandson, a recovering addict,
was being assisted by a pastor and close family
friend, and who is experienced in this field. He
rang me to tell me that the drug lords were
demanding R1000 for my grandson's release. We
contacted police commissioner Hamilton Gedi who
immediately saw to it that the drug lords were
arrested. Sadly, all too often, such criminal acts
end in tears for the victims families instead of for
the perpetrators.
Crime continues to blight South
Africa. Although we want to present the image of the
strong, confident and beautiful country we are to
the world in the run up to the World Cup, we should
not be distracted from the seriousness of our crime
problem. In fact, I contend, other countries will
respect us more if we are honest about the problem
and plainly spell out what we are doing to resolve
it. Nor should we be blind to the multiplying
effects of crime such as the negative stereotyping
of immigrants which fuels xenophobic attacks and the
determent of foreign investment and capital.
There can be little doubt that the
responsibility for the unhappy state of affairs must
lie at the top. The ANC has long been accused of a
lukewarm acknowledgement of the crime problem and of
much policy dithering. Some experts have gone as far
as to say that the government has no credible plan
to combat crime at all. Rather than tackle
criminals, the impulse of the ruling party has often
been to attack crime "whingers", as one Minister of
Safety and Security memorably referred to the
victims of crime, advising them to emigrate. At
least, the rhetoric has changed. That is a start.
There is little doubt in my mind
that the violent crime which is blighting the
quality of community life in South Africa nowadays
is, in part, a consequence of the breakdown of the
rule-of-law during the armed struggle. Government
statistics indicate that violent crimes such as
murder and (reported) robberies have decreased in
recent years since they peaked in the late 1990s.
The rape and assault rates, however, show no signs
of such a slowdown. Car hijackings and cash in
transit heists have actually been on the increase.
There is no denying that crime has
had a pronounced effect on our society. Although
crime rages most in our townships and informal
settlements where much of it goes unreported,
middle-class South Africans in their numbers have
steadily moved into gated communities, abandoning
the central business districts of many cities to the
criminal elements and urban decay. Many emigrants of
all races from South Africa also state that crime
was a big motivator for them to pack up and go.
Crime against the farming community has further
exacerbated the problem of food security.
Crime has cut right across the
familiar categories of race and class and, in doing
so, it has elicited a fairly uniform response. It
has blunted our emotional response to the victims'
suffering while our criminals have created a firm
impression that human life is not valued in South
Africa as much as in some less violent societies.
The violent nature and the widespread acceptance of
the reality of crime have made the less extreme
forms of anti-social behaviour, such as
drug-peddling and vandalism relatively tolerable.
One only needs to turn left onto Adderley Street
from parliament to often see young children using
tick or other substances. It is a tragic scene
mirrored across our nation's towns and cities.
There is much to be done, but
first of all, we need a more profound rebalancing of
the justice system in favour of the victims of
crime.
The key theme of all our criminal
legislation has, since 1994, been around the
prevention of miscarriages of justice. Law and order
policy continue to be focused on the offender's
rights rather than on protecting the innocent. In
the meantime, the worst criminals have become better
organised and more violent. The petty criminals are
no longer the misguided villains of old, but
cold-blooded drug dealers and substance abusers
without any residual moral sense.
To boost their ranks, our broken
society has produced a group of young people who are
brought up without parental discipline, without
proper role models and without any sense of
responsibility to others. The latest study by the
South African Institute of Race Relations (July 2009) informs us that overall,
between 2002 and 2007, the proportion of children
living with both parents dropped, from 38% in 2002
to 34% in 2007. In the same period, the proportion
of children living with only mothers increased by
9%. Those living with neither parent increased by
14%.
None of us wants a return to the
old authoritarian prejudices of apartheid. What we
and our people, most of whom are socially
conservative, do want are rules, order and proper
behaviour. We want a society of respect. We want a
society of mutual responsibility. We want a
community where the decent, hard-working and
law-abiding majority are in charge. We want a
society where those who play by the rules are
rewarded and those who do not, are duly punished.
Adding to the existing police service personnel or
making cosmetic alterations to the criminal justice
system will not bring about a moral revival which I
believe is the prerequisite to a society of mutual
respect.
At the level of local government
specifically, we need to strengthen communities by
promoting an ongoing dialogue between local people
and local leaders. The filling in the middle of the
cake - that layer we call civil society has become
more thinly spread since 1994. The liberation
struggle galvanised an amazing array of community
associations linking residents, faith-based and
cultural groupings as well as youth and women's
clubs. They all pulled our society together.
Today their proliferation and
health must be nurtured, not suppressed, as it
sometimes happens. By turning our back on the civic
initiatives around us, we give criminals, be they
murderers or drug lords, even less reason than they
have to respect human life.
I am confident that local
initiative can help combat crime. In addition to
decentralising the police service, police forums can
provide a major opportunity to bring the police,
local authorities and public closer together.
Community policing is a big part of the answer to
the incipient anarchy, although, I would add, we are
opposed to the establishment of street committees
because of their association with vigilantism in the
struggle era. We, in short, must have a police force
that is non-aligned, that takes policing decisions
on policing grounds and that protects people's
rights under the Constitution. Such a police service
must also be better resourced and we welcome Mr Cele's commitment to increase the numbers of police
by 20 000 members.
Finally, as we have so often
stated, we desperately need decentralised policing: policing with strong
local roots. This has proven successful in the New
York Police Department (NYPD) and British
constabularies.
The IFP has advocated that our
police services acquire technical assistance from
these police services, too.
Where neighbourhood policing has
been rolled out in the UK, public perception about
combating anti-social, or yobbish behaviour, as the
Brits call it, has risen, as has confidence in the
police. The success of the programme has been based
upon the notion that it listens and responds to
local problems. This notion, of course, presupposes
mutual respect. I believe success in inculcating a
modern culture of respect could lay the foundations
of success in so many other aspects of our nation's
life. Not everything is a question of resources and
wealth - as Mr Cele is just about to find
out.
Yours sincerely,
Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi, MP