My dear
friends and fellow South Africans,
Last July, America's fabled
National Broadcasting Corporation (NBC) news
anchorman, Walter Cronkite, passed away. He was 92.
Cronkite was to me, like millions of Americans and
people around the world of my generation who
remember when radios were called wirelesses (and
before we went wireless!), a familiar face. He was
already a well-known face when I spent a couple of
weeks in Chicago, during my first visit to the US,
in 1963. Later I had the pleasure too of being
interviewed by him: a real gentleman
Cronkite pioneered and then
mastered the role of television news anchorman with
such plain-spoken grace that he was called the most
trusted man in America. He was, as the New York
Times put it, "a nightly presence in American homes
and always a reassuring one, guiding viewers through
national triumphs and tragedies alike, from
moonwalks to war, in an era when network news was
central to many people's lives. "He became something
of a national institution, with an unflappable
delivery, a distinctively avuncular voice and a
daily benediction: "And that's the way
it is." He was Uncle Walter to many:
respected, liked and listened to."
Cronkite, also (and I want you
dear reader, for a moment if you will, to think
laterally and insert HIV-Aids or the arms deal in SA
here) like Robert F. Kennedy, spoke a language
critical of U.S. policy in Vietnam that appealed to
the middle class. They could get away with harshly
criticising Johnson's war in Vietnam without
worrying about being told they were "unAmerican",
although their political enemies tried. In those
times, integrity was all. Why do I recount this? I
am writing about the need, as I see it, to
'home-grow' our own super-class of genuine and
independent political-cum-current affairs analysts: a new calibre of South
African Cronkites and Sir Richard and Jonathan
Dimblebys.
I am amazed when I open the
newspapers or watch television at the sheer ubiquity
of so-called political analysts; we might have more
political analysts per ratio than doctors! I am sure
we have some very fine minds, but, with all due
respect, there is a dearth of genuine bona fide
independent political analysts who are not
sympathetic to or are blatantly in the pocket of the
ANC: men or women who could credibly say "And that's
the way it is." I am obviously not speaking of
political science graduates who conduct research for
political parties and think-tanks, but individuals
who by dint of their mastery of detail and the
unmistakable power of their impartiality are
conduits of the news.
Refining this question further, we
can clearly see the dilatory impact of the absence
of such a gold standard class of political analysts
upon the dire and partial coverage of South African
politics. The party I lead, the Inkatha Freedom
Party, has long been sidelined by the media and my
political obituary must be the longest
leave-partaking note in the history of humanity.
Political analysts have long predicted the demise of
the IFP without any serious evaluation of why
people, at the last election, in the words of one
academic, "voted for the IFP, despite the Zuma
factor and the method of politics by which the IFP
sets itself apart from other parties continue to
resonate with and to reflect the opinions of more
than 800, 000 people. If Zuma could not capture
these votes from the IFP, who possibly can?"
Indeed. The Zunami was going to sweep the IFP
from the face of the earth, remember?
As an aside, it is worth noting
that while President Zuma seeks to promote
reconciliation between the ANC and the IFP, one
prominent political analyst, as Anthea Jeffery's
book People's War reveals, was a leading member of
Umkhonto we Sizwe and was then, as now, a fierce
opponent of the IFP.
Last week, the IFP won three
by-elections in KwaZulu-Natal. The result,
especially the previously contested ward three in
Imbabazane (the Electoral Court declared the results
of the March by-election invalid after the ANC
formally objected), received scant coverage. I would
have thought that this might have been interesting
to a political analyst worth their salt and,
perhaps, could have merited an interpolation with
recent trends or even a rough projection for the 2011 local government election
result. What I am sure of is if we had lost two of
the by-elections, there would have been rather more
coverage along the lines of "IFP in freefall" or
'Buthelezi's last stand" etc. Did you see how much
coverage Cope received when they recently won the
Thembisa by-election, despite a litany of
by-election disasters before that? Where is the
serious analysis?
Then there was the much vaunted
launch of the presidential hotline '17737' the week
before last.
I thought I better go to demonstrate that the
opposition supported worthy - if a bit gimmicky -
initiatives. Alas, I was only to
be joined by my colleagues from the ACDP and the
PAC. Maybe, just maybe, our other colleagues knew
something we did not or, like the DA apparently,
were just trying to get connected to the hotline
only to be disconnected after thirty minutes or so.
SABC television interviewed me about the hotline. I
said something along the lines of: "I welcome this
because at last government has awoken from its
slumber and wants to hear from real people about
their concerns about issues like HIV-Aids and
crime." To put this in context, you might recall
that a few years ago the ANC benches in parliament
and then Deputy-President Zuma rocked with mirth
when the former ANC Chief Whip Mr Mbulelo Goniwe
mocked me for suggesting that every South African
had been affected by crime.
So, with this in mind, 'Yours
Truly' also dutifully gave the same comment in
isiZulu after the English recording. My comments did
not appear on the news in either language and, I
suppose, anyone watching the news might think my
colleagues' and I had gone along to merely support
the government as opposition cheerleaders and chew
the fat with the President. As if! What is clear as
a fish rots from the head downwards, the lacuna of a
gold standard class of political analysts is
"dumbing down" our entire political discourse, and
inhibiting the style of national conversation which
democracies like America and Britain have long
enjoyed.
Sincerely,
Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi MP