|
IFP PRESS
STATEMENT RELEASED BY:
SUZANNE VOS MP
INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY SPOKESPERSON ON COMMUNICATIONS
14th August 2008
The
objection yesterday, August 13, in the PC on Communications
(National Assembly) of the Inkatha Freedom Party to the
Broadcasting Amendment Bill -- in its entirety - was recorded.
When the
Bill is debated in Parliament next week the IFP will, once
again, vigorously oppose the amendments which we believe (for
many reasons) will be an enabling factor for direct political
interference into the governance of the public broadcaster and,
in tandem, an obvious assault on the independence of the board
of the SABC. There is no doubt whatsoever that this Bill, if
passed into law, will have far-reaching and deleterious
consequences.
We also
question the attempt by the ANC to fudge the doctrine of
separation of powers (in this case between the Executive and the
Legislature) inherent in the Constitution of the Republic. They
have come up with the idea that in their view it is
constitutionally sound that the "appointing body" (of the board
of the SABC) can now mean "the President in consultation with
the Speaker of the National Assembly"! The IFP has its serious
doubts and believes that jurisprudence on this particular matter
in our Courts may be urgently required.
Clearly the
IFP will also consider petitioning the President of the Republic
not to sign the Bill into law once it is passed by Parliament
and to, instead, send it back. This has happened in various
instances before (and interestingly in Bills pertaining to the
Independent Communications Authority of South Africa - ICASA -
and in the early days of the very Broadcasting Act now once
again in contention). We sincerely hope that it may be able to
happen again in this case.
The ANC
argument that the public broadcaster (with its crucial mandate
to inform, educate and entertain South African citizens) can be
treated like any other State institution is patently
ridiculous.
South Africa
is now in danger of sliding towards the reality in the majority
of African States where the so-called public broadcaster is
controlled by the State and ruling political parties. This was
the case under National Party rule and apartheid when the SABC
was most certainly a State broadcaster and not a public
broadcaster. At CODESA and after the advent of democracy in 1994
it was recognized that the SABC must be a truly independent
public broadcaster. Slowly and surely the ANC is chipping away
at the very foundation which ensures an independent public
broadcaster - its governance.
The fact
that the Constitution of the Republic (S.192) stipulates that an
"independent authority" (now ICASA) must ". regulate
broadcasting in the public interest, and to ensure fairness and
a diversity of views broadly representing South African
society" is a clear indication and an acceptance that
broadcasting (whether public or private entities) must be
protected from political interference.
The ANC
proposal to enable the "appointing authority" to remove an
entire board of the SABC "after a finding" by a committee of the
National Assembly is outrageous.
Who in their
right minds would offer to serve as a member of a board of the
SABC if, not even after "due enquiry" but merely "after a
finding", a committee of politicians in the National Assembly
can tear their reputations to shreds and have them removed from
office one by one or holus-bolus?
Persons of
integrity and expertise in various fields are nominated by the
public and recommended by Parliament to serve on the SABC board
with the explicit intention that they will apply their minds
independently in the best interests of the Corporation and the
public at large.
This Bill,
if passed into law, will have a distinctly chilling effect on
the independence of the board.
To make
matters even worse (if that is possible), the ANC has proposed
that in the event that an entire SABC board is chucked out after
a "finding" by a committee of the National Assembly", it will 10
days later replace them with an "interim board" consisting of
senior SABC management executives and "five other persons
recommended by the National Assembly" for a period of up to six
months! No mention is made of how these persons will be chosen
and whether this will be a public process or a fast track for
the appointment of political pals! No mention is made (as was
proposed in submissions) that this most certainly must not
happen during an election period!
It is
patently clear why this Bill must be opposed and the IFP is also
hoping that media bodies and concerned citizens in general will
also voice their condemnation.
SUZANNE VOS
MP - INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY
083 303
0451
svos@iafrica.com |